Skip to main content

Pandemic Ecclesiology

 The enforced closing of Sunday and other "in-person" gathering led to many churches experimenting with online and alternative methods of working.

But I wonder if enough reflection has been done theologically, and ecclesiologically around this.

I wonder what moving forward post-covid will look like, or will the moment be lost in the haste of re-opening, of going back to our old ways?

Frost & Hirsch in their influential book from a few years ago now, "The Shaping of Things to Come". raise some questions worth reflecting on


  • Do you need to meet in a church building? Not necessarily.
  • Do you need to meet weekly? Not necessarily. The first Christians met every day. A church can meet as often as it needs in order to fulfill the above commitments. 
  • Do you need a minister? Not necessarily. The New Testament is clear on the need for accountability, admonishment, and learning. It does speak about leaders (elders) exercising humble and loving care for a community. But you don’t need an ordained minister for that.
  •  Do you need to sing hymns? Not necessarily. There is mention in the New Testament of the value of singing spiritual songs. But if the goal is that worship and learning occur when you meet, you can use as few (none?) or as many songs as you need. 
  • Does someone have to bring a sermon? Not necessarily. As long as people have an opportunity to hear from God, through his Word and other means, it doesn’t matter whether one person speaks for thirty minutes or thirty people contribute a minute each. Learning, worship, and the opportunity for God’s Word are essential. How they play out is entirely open to experimentation. 
Ask yourself, “If we could start church all over again from scratch, would we do it the way it’s currently being done?”

Frost, Michael. The Shaping of Things to Come: Innovation and Mission for the 21st-Century Church (p. 106). Baker Publishing Group. Kindle Edition. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hypermarket or corner store?

 Many years ago it seemed to me that churches were heading the way of supermarkets! Either large "hypermarkets": stock everything, well staffed, bright but impersonal, or corner shops: local, convenient, potentially connecting personally but limited offering. The struggle is the middle size, not quite one thing but not quite the other. Maybe it feels uncomfortable to speak of churches in such consumer, market driven terms. But for the UK church that is in many ways the reality. These 2 articles, from quite different "tribes", articulate some of the issues this raises: https://www.londonseminary.org/goodbye-local-church/ https://www.baptist.org.uk/Articles/663265/What_would_it.aspx  

Singing

One of the things many have missed over the last 16 months or so in church life has been congregational, corporate singing. Initially it was because we were not able to gather, but now many churches are gathering "in person", but singing is still off the agenda, due to the way the coronavirus spreads. As a musician and someone who has led sung worship for more years than I would like to confess, I too miss the sound and feeling of a congregation passionately praising God in song. I think Eugene Peterson put it well: "Because God, and therefore the worship of God cannot be reduced to the rational, song has always been the basic act of worship. Music is not added to words to make them more pleasing; it is integral to the way words are being used as openings to the transcendent, as windows to the mystery, as joining in the dance of the Trinity" Some congregations are singing outside, others I'm sure are swerving the guidelines in different ways. But it does concern...

Numbers

 Almost a year ago I wrote a post called "Counting". A year on and nearly all legal restrictions around the pandemic have gone in the UK (not that Covid-19 has gone away though!). With most churches now gathering in their buildings, or other physical spaces, the issue of counting and numbers continues to appear in different ways, I have heard many churches urging people to "come back" (not sure "back" language is helpful, but that's another issue). While this may be a right and proper encouragement and biblical emphasis on the "gathered-ness" of church,  I wonder if that is always the case? Are we willing to face changing attendance patterns, not as simply lack of commitment, or being driven by fear (as I have sometimes heard implied), but as a creative opportunity for discipleship? What if we really did start thinking in terms of engagement rather than simply attendance? What does it really mean for programmes and priorities to make disciple...