Skip to main content
Breaking out of our "forms"
One of the things that 2020 and the Covid-19 crisis has exposed, is that Churches are set on their "forms": their ways of working and doing things, and that breaking out of those is tricky!

My experience is with those churches who are "free churches": we are not bound by Bishops or canon law, yet we find it hard to think beyond our inherited ways. This has meant that over the years there have been battles about the "forms": the way we organised services and set things up. We had struggles over the music, the so called "worship-wars", the issues around charismatic renewal and the place of the gifts of the Spirit in our gatherings. In the 2000's along came the "emerging church" movement, which tried to approach things in new ways, leading to "fresh expressions". And things have changed. But in many ways we are still struggling to break free from a Christendom mindset (see Stuart Murray's "Post-Christendom" and "Church after Christendom" for more on that).

Then in March 2020 came a disruptive force. With good reason, governments in the UK and elsewhere issued instructions for groups, including churches not to gather. Many churches have been quick to "pivot", to go online via Zoom, YouTube, Facebook Live and other platforms. Sunday church as we had known it was interrupted, perhaps even more so than during the wars of the previous century.

Some churches have been very creative, adapting the message to the medium. Using video and online formats in fresh ways. Many, however, it seems have found it hard to let go of their old forms. Is having our full band in an empty sanctuary really the best way to lead worship on video platform? Is a 30 minute plus preach, stood at a podium the best way to speak to people?

The easing of lockdown and the question of going back to in-person gatherings has illustrated further our "stuckness" when it comes to forms. We have an opportunity to break out of our "Sunday morning" church mindset, to be creative and do things differently. Yet many are simply wanting to go back to how things were, lamenting that we can't sing and fellowship in the way we used to. Yes this is a loss, letting go is hard. But what if this is an opportunity rather than a problem? A chance to help people grow in discipleship and mission rather than simply return to being consumers of our church products? What if this is chance to return, as one writer  put it, not to the old ways but the "much older ways" (see "Reclaiming God's Original Intent for the Church", by Roberts and Marshall). 
To break the bounds of our Christendom legacy. To be more like the movement we see in Acts and elsewhere, rather than the institution we have become. To break the consumer mindset. 

I am not suggesting this is easy, or that I have all the answers.
But what if this is a creative opportunity for churches to step up to?



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hypermarket or corner store?

 Many years ago it seemed to me that churches were heading the way of supermarkets! Either large "hypermarkets": stock everything, well staffed, bright but impersonal, or corner shops: local, convenient, potentially connecting personally but limited offering. The struggle is the middle size, not quite one thing but not quite the other. Maybe it feels uncomfortable to speak of churches in such consumer, market driven terms. But for the UK church that is in many ways the reality. These 2 articles, from quite different "tribes", articulate some of the issues this raises: https://www.londonseminary.org/goodbye-local-church/ https://www.baptist.org.uk/Articles/663265/What_would_it.aspx  
Post a Comment
Read more

Opportunity or Threat?

 It's amazing to still be hearing some church and ministry leaders talk as if online is a threat to church as we used to know it! The reality is that church as we used to know it, pre-Covid has gone. Online was not just something we did for the pandemic, but is here to stay. Yes there is a danger that it creates consumers and spectators, but then many of our models of church were doing that anyway. Part of the issue, I think, is the rush to equate online with streaming what happens in the building. The rhetoric then becomes around those who can't or won't  return (and I have heard it said with an slight air of superiority, are too "fearful"). But digital engagement can be so much more, an opportunity to connect in new ways, to communicate beyond our boundaries. As Brady Shearer and others have said, Social Media is not about advertising ministry, it is  ministry. So what if we stopped talking in terms of threat and started thinking in terms of opportunity. What if...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Memory of Faith

 It is common to think of the UK as "post-Christendom", or even post-Christian. Census and surveys paint a picture of church decline. Faithfully following Jesus, yet alone seeing those from outside the church come to faith can be tough. Daniel Strange describes it this way: "The good news of Jesus is deeply implausible  in our culture at the moment...the cultural air they have breathed all their lives has shaped them to assume Christianity is irrelevant, untrue and intolerant" ("Plugged In", p32). Yet the memory of faith lingers, in music, in culture, and beyond in ways that keep popping up. I was recently at a secular event where the crowd participation moment was to get those gathered to join in singing "Come and go with me to my Father's house". It was quite something to hear the room belting out the words of there being joy in the Father's house forever! Did anyone even notice the good news they were singing? This weekend was Glastonb...
Post a Comment
Read more